HIGH vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIGH returned -1.25% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HIGH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

HIGH vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

HIGH

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.14%
• YTD: -1.00%
• 1Y: -1.25%
• 3Y*: 2.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.43%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	$264.89K	$245.02K	$537.34K

HIGH vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	-1.00%	-2.33%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and AMDW is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

HIGH vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HIGH

HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 8
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HIGH vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIGH	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	2.36	-2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	2.92	-3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.36	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	5.83	-6.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	11.47	-11.81

HIGH vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIGH	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-34.64%	+25.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-34.64%	+27.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-21.39%	+13.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-13.97%	+11.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	17.59%	-13.13%

Volatility

HIGH vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) is 2.16%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that HIGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIGH	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.16%	28.87%	-26.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.90%	67.40%	-63.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.23%	85.70%	-78.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.46%	85.05%	-75.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.46%	85.05%	-75.59%

HIGH vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIGH vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	6.88%	7.71%	8.34%	9.40%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIGH and AMDW in my portfolio?

HIGH and AMDW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIGH or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to HIGH (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, HIGH or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs -1.25% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIGH or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs -1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIGH or AMDW?

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIGH or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 6.88% for HIGH.

What is the main difference between HIGH and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIGH and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.