HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO
HIG.TO (Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF) and XDNA.TO (iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. HIG.TO is actively managed, while XDNA.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIG.TO returned 3.66%/yr vs 14.77%/yr for XDNA.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIG.TO achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDNA.TO's 29.19% return.
HIG.TO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- 8.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
XDNA.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 10.93%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 60.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIG.TO Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF | -3.42% | 13.94% | -0.33% | -1.53% | 0.12% |
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 29.19% | 12.10% | 5.54% | -7.84% | -14.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIG.TO and XDNA.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HIG.TO
XDNA.TO
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIG.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 7.02 | -6.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 16.10 | -14.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIG.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum XDNA.TO drawdown of -45.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIG.TO and XDNA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIG.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -45.90% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -8.64% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.18% | -28.29% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -6.85% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -22.99% | +14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 3.76% | +2.25% |
Volatility
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG.TO) is 6.30%, while iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that HIG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIG.TO | XDNA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 7.84% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 18.84% | -7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 25.64% | -10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 25.42% | -10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 25.42% | -8.05% |
Dividends
HIG.TO vs. XDNA.TO - Dividend Comparison
HIG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than XDNA.TO's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIG.TO Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF | 9.00% | 8.32% | 8.71% | 8.03% | 6.97% | 5.29% | 6.22% | 6.12% | 7.11% | 6.43% | 6.47% | 1.80% |
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 0.25% | 0.43% | 0.32% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIG.TO and XDNA.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HIG.TO and XDNA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer