XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO
XDNA.TO (iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF) and HHL.TO (Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. XDNA.TO is passively managed, while HHL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDNA.TO returned 7.28%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for HHL.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDNA.TO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HHL.TO.
Performance
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDNA.TO achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than HHL.TO's -8.20% return.
XDNA.TO
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 40.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHL.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 10.45% | 12.10% | 5.54% | -7.84% | -13.38% |
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | -8.20% | 10.47% | 3.87% | 6.74% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDNA.TO and HHL.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XDNA.TO
HHL.TO
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO) and Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDNA.TO | HHL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.07 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.67 | 0.36 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 0.90 | +10.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDNA.TO | HHL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 0.32 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.33 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDNA.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.90%, which is greater than HHL.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNA.TO and HHL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDNA.TO | HHL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.90% | -26.70% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -12.88% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.29% | -16.01% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -11.20% | +2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -6.23% | -17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 5.18% | -1.50% |
Volatility
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF (XDNA.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) at 5.49%. This indicates that XDNA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HHL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDNA.TO | HHL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 5.49% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 10.11% | +7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.71% | 14.40% | +10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 14.11% | +11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 15.79% | +9.53% |
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDNA.TO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than HHL.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDNA.TO vs. HHL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XDNA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than HHL.TO's 10.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHL.TO Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF | 10.64% | 9.36% | 9.27% | 8.71% | 8.51% | 7.91% | 9.02% | 8.65% | 9.00% | 8.45% | 8.83% | 8.19% |
XDNA.TO iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.32% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDNA.TO and HHL.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDNA.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNA.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HHL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XDNA.TO and 0.85% for HHL.TO.
Find the right allocation for XDNA.TO and HHL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer