PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDR.L achieves a -39.26% return, which is significantly lower than CPJ1.L's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, HIDR.L has underperformed CPJ1.L with an annualized return of -3.49%, while CPJ1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.


HIDR.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
-19.17%
YTD
-39.26%
6M
-40.84%
1Y
-39.36%
3Y*
-23.10%
5Y*
-9.04%
10Y*
-3.49%

CPJ1.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.62%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIDR.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD
-39.26%-8.13%-13.17%-0.80%15.43%2.40%-11.41%4.86%-4.08%12.22%
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.83%12.05%6.89%0.15%4.86%5.71%3.46%14.30%-5.53%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDR.L and CPJ1.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2011

0.40

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIDR.L
CPJ1.L

Financial Services

56.9%
45.5%

Basic Materials

12.8%
15.5%

Communication Services

11.6%
2.9%

Industrials

7.9%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
2.9%

Technology

3.4%
1.1%

Energy

1.7%
2.8%

Utilities

1.6%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.1%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

7.9%

Financial Services

HIDR.L
56.9%
CPJ1.L
45.5%

Basic Materials

HIDR.L
12.8%
CPJ1.L
15.5%

Communication Services

HIDR.L
11.6%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Industrials

HIDR.L
7.9%
CPJ1.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

HIDR.L
4.2%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Technology

HIDR.L
3.4%
CPJ1.L
1.1%

Energy

HIDR.L
1.7%
CPJ1.L
2.8%

Utilities

HIDR.L
1.6%
CPJ1.L
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HIDR.L

-

CPJ1.L
6.1%

Healthcare

HIDR.L

-

CPJ1.L
3.2%

Real Estate

HIDR.L

-

CPJ1.L
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDR.L
HIDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIDR.LCPJ1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.29

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

2.41

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.56

7.27

-9.83

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDR.L and CPJ1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIDR.LCPJ1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.59

1.59

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.44

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.54

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.45

-0.55

Drawdowns

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDR.L drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than CPJ1.L's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDR.L and CPJ1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDR.LCPJ1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-32.49%

-25.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.78%

-7.23%

-35.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.23%

-17.15%

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.31%

-17.61%

-40.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.31%

-32.49%

-25.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.31%

-2.97%

-55.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-6.90%

-11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.35%

2.40%

+12.95%

Volatility

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) at 3.70%. This indicates that HIDR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPJ1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDR.LCPJ1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

3.70%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

8.65%

+11.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.69%

10.99%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

13.74%

+6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

15.93%

+8.64%

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDR.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison

HIDR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIDR.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD
6.25%4.87%3.49%3.49%2.04%1.27%1.75%1.61%1.50%1.14%1.12%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDR.L and CPJ1.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPJ1.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPJ1.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDR.L.

HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIDR.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDR.L and CPJ1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer