PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIDR.L is traded in GBp, while CP9U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CP9U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDR.L achieves a -39.26% return, which is significantly lower than CP9U.L's 2.32% return.


HIDR.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
-19.17%
YTD
-39.26%
6M
-40.84%
1Y
-39.36%
3Y*
-23.10%
5Y*
-9.04%
10Y*
-3.49%

CP9U.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
2.32%
6M
1.57%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HIDR.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD
-39.26%-8.13%-13.17%-0.80%15.43%2.40%-11.41%1.76%
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
2.32%5.38%1.15%-0.06%-2.40%6.05%0.59%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDR.L and CP9U.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019

0.17

Over the past year, HIDR.L and CP9U.L have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HIDR.L
CP9U.L

Financial Services

56.9%
48.0%

Basic Materials

12.8%
10.4%

Communication Services

11.6%
2.5%

Industrials

7.9%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
3.1%

Technology

3.4%
2.2%

Energy

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.9%

Healthcare

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

12.3%

Financial Services

HIDR.L
56.9%
CP9U.L
48.0%

Basic Materials

HIDR.L
12.8%
CP9U.L
10.4%

Communication Services

HIDR.L
11.6%
CP9U.L
2.5%

Industrials

HIDR.L
7.9%
CP9U.L
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

HIDR.L
4.2%
CP9U.L
3.1%

Technology

HIDR.L
3.4%
CP9U.L
2.2%

Energy

HIDR.L
1.7%
CP9U.L

-

Utilities

HIDR.L
1.6%
CP9U.L
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HIDR.L

-

CP9U.L
3.9%

Healthcare

HIDR.L

-

CP9U.L
4.7%

Real Estate

HIDR.L

-

CP9U.L
12.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDR.L
HIDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CP9U.L
CP9U.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIDR.LCP9U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.07

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

0.56

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.56

1.43

-3.99

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDR.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the CP9U.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDR.L and CP9U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIDR.LCP9U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.59

0.33

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.19

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.20

-0.30

Drawdowns

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDR.L drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than CP9U.L's maximum drawdown of -29.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDR.L and CP9U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDR.LCP9U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-29.43%

-28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.78%

-7.49%

-35.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.23%

-15.58%

-38.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.31%

-17.69%

-40.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.31%

-6.31%

-52.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-5.33%

-12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.35%

2.93%

+12.42%

Volatility

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) at 4.64%. This indicates that HIDR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP9U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDR.LCP9U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

4.64%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

10.26%

+10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.69%

12.71%

+11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

17.82%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

20.76%

+3.81%

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CP9U.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Dividend Comparison

HIDR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP9U.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIDR.L
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD
6.25%4.87%3.49%3.49%2.04%1.27%1.75%1.61%1.50%1.14%1.12%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDR.L and CP9U.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CP9U.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CP9U.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDR.L.

HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while CP9U.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIDR.L and 0.35% for CP9U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDR.L and CP9U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer