HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L
HIDR.L (HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD) and CP9U.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HIDR.L tracks the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR while CP9U.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIDR.L returned -9.04%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for CP9U.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIDR.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CP9U.L.
Performance
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HIDR.L is traded in GBp, while CP9U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CP9U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIDR.L achieves a -39.26% return, which is significantly lower than CP9U.L's 2.32% return.
HIDR.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -19.17%
- YTD
- -39.26%
- 6M
- -40.84%
- 1Y
- -39.36%
- 3Y*
- -23.10%
- 5Y*
- -9.04%
- 10Y*
- -3.49%
CP9U.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- —
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD | -39.26% | -8.13% | -13.17% | -0.80% | 15.43% | 2.40% | -11.41% | 1.76% |
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 2.32% | 5.38% | 1.15% | -0.06% | -2.40% | 6.05% | 0.59% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIDR.L and CP9U.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, HIDR.L and CP9U.L have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Basic Materials
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Communication Services
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Industrials
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Consumer Defensive
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Technology
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Energy
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
-
Utilities
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
Consumer Cyclical
HIDR.L
-
CP9U.L
Healthcare
HIDR.L
-
CP9U.L
Real Estate
HIDR.L
-
CP9U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L — Risk / Return Rank
HIDR.L
CP9U.L
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIDR.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.07 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 0.56 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.56 | 1.43 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIDR.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.59 | 0.33 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.19 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.20 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIDR.L drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than CP9U.L's maximum drawdown of -29.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDR.L and CP9U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIDR.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -29.43% | -28.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.78% | -7.49% | -35.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.23% | -15.58% | -38.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.31% | -17.69% | -40.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.31% | -6.31% | -52.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.11% | -5.33% | -12.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.35% | 2.93% | +12.42% |
Volatility
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD (HIDR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) at 4.64%. This indicates that HIDR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP9U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIDR.L | CP9U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 4.64% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.56% | 10.26% | +10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.69% | 12.71% | +11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 17.82% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 20.76% | +3.81% |
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIDR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CP9U.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIDR.L vs. CP9U.L - Dividend Comparison
HIDR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIDR.L HSBC MSCI Indonesia UCITS ETF USD | 6.25% | 4.87% | 3.49% | 3.49% | 2.04% | 1.27% | 1.75% | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.12% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIDR.L and CP9U.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CP9U.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CP9U.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIDR.L.
HIDR.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while CP9U.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HIDR.L and 0.35% for CP9U.L.
Find the right allocation for HIDR.L and CP9U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer