PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDE vs. ASMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDE vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDE achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 73.28% return.


HIDE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.50%
6M
5.33%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
9.29%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
10Y*

ASMH

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.06%
6M
44.58%
YTD
73.28%
1Y
132.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDE vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIDE and ASMH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDE vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDE
HIDE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDE vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIDEASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

8.42

-5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

20.90

-11.71

HIDE vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDE and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIDE vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDE drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDE and ASMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDEASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-15.89%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-15.89%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-9.55%

+7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-4.32%

+3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

6.39%

-5.40%

Volatility

HIDE vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) is 1.60%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 19.55%. This indicates that HIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDEASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

19.55%

-17.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

34.41%

-30.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

43.50%

-38.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

41.24%

-36.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

41.24%

-36.95%

HIDE vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDE vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

HIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than ASMH's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
1.61%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIDE
Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF
2.98%3.16%2.86%3.90%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDE and ASMH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMH has higher volatility (19.55%) compared to HIDE (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDE dropped -5.15% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 132.82% vs 9.29% for HIDE. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HIDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 132.82% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HIDE.

HIDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.61% for ASMH.

HIDE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ASMH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HIDE and 0.19% for ASMH.

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDE and ASMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer