PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDE vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDE vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDE achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.


HIDE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.84%
6M
4.51%
YTD
7.48%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.80%

CAOS

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.01%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.81M$5.39M$5.09M
$1.44M$1.27M$1.13M

HIDE vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIDE
Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF
7.48%5.32%-0.85%2.61%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.76%2.55%5.33%7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDE and CAOS is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDE vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HIDE
HIDE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HIDE vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIDECAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.24

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.47

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

5.45

+5.11

HIDE vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDE and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIDE vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDE drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDE and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDECAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-3.89%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-0.76%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-3.60%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.13%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.92%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.34%

+0.69%

Volatility

HIDE vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF (HIDE) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that HIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDECAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.51%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

1.07%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

1.57%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

4.18%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.30%

4.18%

+0.12%

HIDE vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDE vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

HIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIDE
Alpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETF
2.94%3.16%2.86%3.90%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIDE and CAOS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIDE has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDE dropped -5.15% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

On 3-year performance, HIDE leads with 4.49% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, HIDE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HIDE has performed better with a 4.49% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIDE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

HIDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

HIDE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CAOS is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HIDE and 0.63% for CAOS.

HIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDE and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer