HIACX vs. GTLOX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HIACX (Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund) and GTLOX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, HIACX returned 13.06%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for GTLOX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIACX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GTLOX.

Performance

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIACX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HIACX having a 13.06% annualized return and GTLOX not far behind at 12.98%.

HIACX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 17.32%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

GTLOX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 22.20%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 42.25%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 12.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	7.01%	13.68%	21.26%	20.01%	-15.73%	14.85%	21.82%	31.00%	-7.15%	22.13%
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	22.20%	14.39%	13.86%	16.66%	-15.37%	27.05%	7.41%	23.27%	-7.97%	24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HIACX and GTLOX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.94

The correlation between HIACX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HIACX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIACX

HIACX Risk / Return Rank: 42
HIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
HIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

GTLOX

GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 92
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIACX	GTLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.99	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.97	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.51	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	5.85	-3.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	24.67	-15.83

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIACX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIACX drawdown since its inception was -92.74%, which is greater than GTLOX's maximum drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIACX and GTLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIACX	GTLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.74%	-54.09%	-38.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-7.47%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-32.85%	+13.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.19%	-32.85%	+7.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.33%	-38.15%	+2.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-0.54%	-1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.51%	-8.31%	-16.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	1.76%	+0.81%

Volatility

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) is 4.70%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that HIACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIACX	GTLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	6.13%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	11.46%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	14.64%	-2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	21.96%	-5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	20.97%	-3.09%

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIACX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIACX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

HIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%, less than GTLOX's 14.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTLOX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio	14.65%	17.84%	25.96%	8.32%	23.58%	13.35%	9.06%	5.35%	10.53%	4.99%	1.08%	2.09%
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	12.11%	12.96%	4.89%	2.43%	16.98%	9.56%	7.62%	12.43%	13.46%	6.53%	11.26%	24.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIACX and GTLOX in my portfolio?

HIACX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIACX or GTLOX?

GTLOX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to HIACX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIACX dropped -92.74% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.