HIACX vs. FNSTX
HIACX (Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund) and FNSTX (Fidelity Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - HIACX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Hartford, while FNSTX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, HIACX returned 8.58%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for FNSTX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HIACX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FNSTX.
Performance
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HIACX having a 5.35% return and FNSTX slightly higher at 5.53%.
HIACX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.32%
FNSTX
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund | 5.35% | 13.68% | 21.26% | 20.01% | -15.73% | 14.85% | 21.82% | 5.39% |
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund | 5.53% | 27.42% | 14.43% | 8.44% | -7.59% | 7.58% | 12.80% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIACX and FNSTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HIACX and FNSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIACX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank
HIACX
FNSTX
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIACX | FNSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 4.03 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIACX drawdown since its inception was -92.74%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIACX and FNSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIACX | FNSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.74% | -35.82% | -56.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -8.81% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -10.94% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -21.97% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -6.86% | +3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -5.14% | -19.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.03% | -0.34% |
Volatility
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) is 3.42%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that HIACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIACX | FNSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 5.37% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 13.52% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 16.87% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 15.35% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 18.76% | -0.98% |
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIACX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIACX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison
HIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than FNSTX's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund | 3.79% | 4.16% | 1.59% | 1.85% | 1.35% | 0.63% | 0.80% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund | 12.30% | 12.96% | 4.89% | 2.43% | 16.98% | 9.56% | 7.62% | 12.43% | 13.46% | 6.53% | 11.26% | 24.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIACX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNSTX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to HIACX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIACX dropped -92.74% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.
HIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIACX and FNSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer