HIACX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIACX (Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - HIACX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Hartford, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, HIACX returned 12.77%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIACX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIACX achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, HIACX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 12.77%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

HIACX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	9.02%	13.68%	21.26%	20.01%	-15.73%	14.85%	21.82%	31.00%	-7.15%	22.13%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HIACX and FCNTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1984	0.81

The correlation between HIACX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HIACX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIACX

HIACX Risk / Return Rank: 48
HIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
HIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIACX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.72	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.39	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.31	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	2.13	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	9.04	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIACX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIACX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIACX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.72	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.79	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.89	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.78	-0.70

Drawdowns

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIACX drawdown since its inception was -92.74%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIACX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIACX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.74%	-49.19%	-43.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-11.30%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-19.75%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.19%	-32.59%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.33%	-32.59%	-2.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.53%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.03%	-8.16%	-16.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.65%	-0.13%

Volatility

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund (HIACX) is 2.69%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that HIACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIACX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	3.26%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	10.48%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.94%	14.03%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.71%	19.15%	-2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.85%	19.68%	-1.83%

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIACX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIACX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

HIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.88%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
HIACX Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS Fund	11.88%	12.96%	4.89%	2.43%	16.98%	9.56%	7.62%	12.43%	13.46%	6.53%	11.26%	24.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIACX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

HIACX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIACX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to HIACX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIACX dropped -92.74% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.