HHCZX vs. QLEIX
HHCZX (NexPoint Event Driven Fund) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX returned 3.95%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for QLEIX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHCZX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.
Performance
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -3.20% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX has underperformed QLEIX with an annualized return of 3.95%, while QLEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.
HHCZX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- -0.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
QLEIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | -3.20% | 6.52% | 7.22% | 5.44% | -5.49% | -17.31% | 22.24% | 11.36% | 12.72% | 8.76% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -1.18% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 31.10% | -13.92% | 1.19% | -16.33% | 15.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between HHCZX and QLEIX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HHCZX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
HHCZX
QLEIX
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HHCZX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.37 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 2.51 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 7.27 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and QLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HHCZX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -38.11% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.42% | -6.01% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -7.07% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | -17.07% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | -38.11% | +5.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.05% | -1.78% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -7.68% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.94% | 2.07% | +6.87% |
Volatility
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison
NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) at 2.93%. This indicates that HHCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HHCZX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.93% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 6.19% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 7.64% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 10.02% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 10.56% | +5.72% |
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HHCZX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison
HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 4.27% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.77% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HHCZX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HHCZX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to QLEIX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHCZX dropped -33.57% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.
QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HHCZX and QLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer