HHCZX vs. VMNFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HHCZX (NexPoint Event Driven Fund) and VMNFX (Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX returned 3.85%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for VMNFX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HHCZX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for VMNFX.

Performance

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHCZX achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly lower than VMNFX's 15.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HHCZX has underperformed VMNFX with an annualized return of 3.85%, while VMNFX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.42% annualized return.

HHCZX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -6.91%
• YTD: -3.77%
• 1Y: -1.06%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: -1.58%
• 10Y*: 3.85%

VMNFX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 15.75%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: 5.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund	-3.77%	6.52%	7.22%	5.44%	-5.49%	-17.31%	22.24%	11.36%	12.72%	8.76%
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares	15.75%	9.27%	5.78%	12.23%	13.48%	23.24%	-11.58%	-9.57%	0.60%	-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HHCZX and VMNFX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2008	0.03

The correlation between HHCZX and VMNFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HHCZX vs. VMNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HHCZX

HHCZX Risk / Return Rank: 3
HHCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HHCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HHCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HHCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HHCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

VMNFX

VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HHCZX	VMNFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	3.06	-3.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	4.62	-4.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.57	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	5.17	-5.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	16.46	-16.60

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HHCZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the VMNFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HHCZX and VMNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHCZX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than VMNFX's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHCZX and VMNFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HHCZX	VMNFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-26.42%	-7.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.42%	-4.65%	-10.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-5.44%	-9.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.51%	-6.75%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.15%	-25.09%	-7.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.55%	0.00%	-15.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	-8.73%	-5.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.85%	1.47%	+7.38%

Volatility

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Volatility Comparison

NexPoint Event Driven Fund (HHCZX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) at 2.43%. This indicates that HHCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HHCZX	VMNFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	2.43%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.81%	5.91%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.57%	7.88%	+8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.54%	7.23%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	6.42%	+9.86%

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHCZX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VMNFX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

HHCZX vs. VMNFX - Dividend Comparison

HHCZX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HHCZX NexPoint Event Driven Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.56%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.06%	0.00%	4.27%
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares	3.03%	3.53%	5.61%	5.09%	0.75%	0.16%	0.81%	3.16%	0.94%	1.07%	0.38%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HHCZX and VMNFX in my portfolio?

HHCZX and VMNFX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HHCZX or VMNFX?

HHCZX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to VMNFX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HHCZX dropped -33.57% vs VMNFX's -26.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.