PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGY.TO vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HGY.TO is traded in CAD, while GC=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GC=F values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGY.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, HGY.TO has underperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 9.42%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


HGY.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
1.16%
6M
3.23%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
9.42%

GC=F

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.71%
YTD
4.48%
6M
5.86%
1Y
34.93%
3Y*
33.26%
5Y*
22.14%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HGY.TO
Global X Gold Yield ETF
1.16%48.66%21.36%9.51%-1.07%-4.51%18.67%13.62%-3.58%8.33%
GC=F
Gold Futures
4.48%56.98%38.43%10.84%6.67%-4.34%22.48%13.03%6.16%6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HGY.TO and GC=F is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2010

0.60

The correlation between HGY.TO and GC=F shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGY.TO vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGY.TO
HGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HGY.TOGC=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.05

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

5.17

-1.47

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGY.TO and GC=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HGY.TOGC=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.32

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.26

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.89

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.64

-0.57

Drawdowns

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -32.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGY.TO and GC=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGY.TOGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-32.19%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.47%

-16.50%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-16.50%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-16.69%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.31%

-22.19%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.54%

-14.33%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-10.57%

-7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

6.63%

-0.13%

Volatility

HGY.TO vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Gold Futures (GC=F) at 5.15%. This indicates that HGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGY.TOGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

5.15%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.71%

21.93%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.45%

25.55%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

17.44%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

16.26%

-0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGY.TO and GC=F have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGY.TO and GC=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer