HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO).
HGY.TO and VALT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HGY.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Dec 14, 2010.
Performance
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 2.11% | 48.66% | 21.36% | 9.51% | -1.07% | -2.46% |
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion Fund | 8.41% | 60.46% | 25.58% | 12.35% | 0.92% | -3.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGY.TO achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than VALT.TO's 8.41% return.
HGY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.74%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 32.43%
- 3Y*
- 24.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
VALT.TO
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 46.70%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HGY.TO
VALT.TO
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) and CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGY.TO | VALT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 2.11 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.51 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 9.19 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGY.TO | VALT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.03 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between HGY.TO and VALT.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Dividend Comparison
HGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, while VALT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGY.TO Global X Gold Yield ETF | 5.53% | 4.92% | 5.32% | 6.10% | 6.42% | 5.87% | 5.72% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.63% | 5.37% | 6.13% |
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -188,898.12%, which is greater than VALT.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGY.TO and VALT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGY.TO | VALT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -188,898.12% | -20.96% | -188,877.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.47% | -19.47% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | -20.96% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -161,050.90% | -13.51% | -161,037.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74,810.45% | -5.49% | -74,804.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 5.31% | -1.05% |
Volatility
HGY.TO vs. VALT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Gold Yield ETF (HGY.TO) is 9.78%, while CI Gold Bullion Fund (VALT.TO) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that HGY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HGY.TO | VALT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 11.12% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 24.22% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.57% | 28.08% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 17.87% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 17.77% | -2.50% |