PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGRO vs. SEIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGRO achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than SEIQ's 7.10% return.


HGRO

1D
0.86%
1M
-1.29%
6M
3.85%
YTD
7.49%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.93%

SEIQ

1D
0.83%
1M
3.20%
6M
5.93%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
13.95%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.36M$1.39M$1.92M
$2.02M$3.08M$2.15M

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and SEIQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.56

The correlation between HGRO and SEIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGRO vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HGRO
HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIQ
SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGROSEIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.45

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

5.49

+1.11

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGRO and SEIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum SEIQ drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and SEIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGROSEIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-14.87%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-9.66%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

0.00%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-2.68%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.55%

+0.07%

Volatility

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGROSEIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

4.01%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

9.30%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

11.53%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

14.58%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.69%

14.58%

-0.89%

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGRO vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SEIQ's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
0.89%0.94%0.97%1.08%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGRO and SEIQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGRO has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SEIQ (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGRO dropped -7.61% vs SEIQ's -14.87%.

On 1-year performance, HGRO leads with 17.25% vs 13.95% for SEIQ. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HGRO has performed better with a 17.25% return vs 13.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HGRO.

SEIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.07% for HGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.15% for SEIQ.

HGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGRO and SEIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer