PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HGRO vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HGRO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HGRO achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 28.93% return.


HGRO

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.05%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
28.93%
6M
30.60%
1Y
60.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HGRO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
8.83%13.45%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
28.93%26.09%

Correlation

The correlation between HGRO and FMTM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.83

The correlation between HGRO and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HGRO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HGRO
HGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HGRO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HGROFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.98

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

19.05

-9.01

HGRO vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HGRO and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HGRO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HGRO drawdown since its inception was -7.61%, smaller than the maximum FMTM drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGRO and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HGROFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-12.12%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-12.12%

+4.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-2.13%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-1.92%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.16%

-0.85%

Volatility

HGRO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) is 5.40%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that HGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HGROFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

8.43%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

18.85%

-8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

23.67%

-10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

23.40%

-9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

23.40%

-9.86%

HGRO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HGRO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HGRO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

HGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.23%0.30%
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HGRO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to HGRO (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HGRO dropped -7.61% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 60.58% vs 24.70% for HGRO. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HGRO has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 60.58% return vs 24.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HGRO.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.07% for HGRO.

HGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HGRO and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HGRO and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer