HG=F vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HG=F vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HG=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 15.62%
• 6M: 13.83%
• 1Y: 35.52%
• 3Y*: 16.64%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 10.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HG=F vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HG=F Copper	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.20%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	15.62%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HG=F and IWM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022	0.05

Return for Risk

HG=F vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 63
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HG=F vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HG=F	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.36	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HG=F	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.71%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.76%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HG=F	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.53%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	22.58%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.07%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HG=F and IWM in my portfolio?

HG=F and IWM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.