PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HG=F vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HG=F vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HG=F

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IEF

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HG=F vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HG=F
Copper
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.29%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.47%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-13.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HG=F and IEF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HG=F vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HG=F

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HG=F vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HG=FIEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

HG=F vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HG=F vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HG=FIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

Volatility

HG=F vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HG=FIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


HG=F and IEF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HG=F and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer