HG=F vs. IEF
HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HG=F vs. IEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEF
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 2.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
HG=F vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.47% | 8.03% | -0.63% | 3.64% | -13.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HG=F and IEF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HG=F vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank
HG=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEF
HG=F vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HG=F | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HG=F vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HG=F | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -11.18% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.35% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
HG=F vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HG=F | IEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.72% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 6.63% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
HG=F and IEF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HG=F and IEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer