IEF vs. LQD
IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEF returned 0.53%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for LQD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
IEF vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEF achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IEF has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 0.53%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.
IEF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.17%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
LQD
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
IEF vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.53% | 8.03% | -0.63% | 3.64% | -15.15% | -3.33% | 10.01% | 8.03% | 0.99% | 2.55% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.73% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEF and LQD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IEF and LQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEF vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
IEF
LQD
IEF vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEF | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.53 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 4.28 | -2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEF vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEF drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, roughly equal to the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEF and LQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEF | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -24.95% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | -3.34% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.74% | -8.43% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -24.95% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.93% | -24.95% | +1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.23% | -3.46% | -7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -3.99% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.19% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IEF vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEF | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.42% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 3.98% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72% | 5.32% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 8.65% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 8.69% | -2.07% |
IEF vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IEF and LQD have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEF vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than LQD's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.90% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.56% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEF and LQD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQD has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to IEF (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEF dropped -23.93% vs LQD's -24.95%.
On 10-year performance, LQD leads with 2.48% vs 0.53% for IEF. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LQD has performed better with a 2.48% return vs 0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEF and LQD have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 3.90% for IEF.
IEF is categorized as Government Bonds, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index.
LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEF and LQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer