PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFXI vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFXI vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFXI achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HFXI has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.32%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.


HFXI

1D
1.44%
1M
1.45%
YTD
18.33%
6M
18.26%
1Y
36.42%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
12.32%

VEA

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
14.71%
6M
14.32%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFXI vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
18.33%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.71%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HFXI and VEA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.91

The correlation between HFXI and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

HFXI vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HFXI
VEA

Financial Services

22.8%
22.3%

Industrials

20.1%
17.5%

Technology

14.6%
16.6%

Healthcare

9.5%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.9%
7.5%

Energy

3.6%
4.7%

Utilities

3.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.5%

Financial Services

HFXI
22.8%
VEA
22.3%

Industrials

HFXI
20.1%
VEA
17.5%

Technology

HFXI
14.6%
VEA
16.6%

Healthcare

HFXI
9.5%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HFXI
7.7%
VEA
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

HFXI
6.3%
VEA
5.5%

Basic Materials

HFXI
5.9%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

HFXI
3.6%
VEA
4.7%

Utilities

HFXI
3.6%
VEA
3.0%

Communication Services

HFXI
3.5%
VEA
3.2%

Real Estate

HFXI
2.5%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFXI vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFXI vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFXIVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.68

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

10.30

+2.89

HFXI vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFXI and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFXI vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFXI drawdown since its inception was -32.42%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFXI and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFXIVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-60.68%

+28.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-11.63%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-13.45%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-29.71%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-35.73%

+3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.70%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-13.25%

+7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.02%

-0.25%

Volatility

HFXI vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 7.10% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFXIVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

6.94%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

14.77%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

16.78%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

16.77%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

17.20%

-0.63%

HFXI vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFXI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HFXI vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

HFXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VEA's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.27%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, HFXI and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HFXI has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to VEA (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFXI dropped -32.42% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 12.32% vs 11.09% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HFXI.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.55% for VEA.

HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HFXI and 0.03% for VEA.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFXI and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer