HFSP vs. LQDH
HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI, while LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -14.56% vs 7.62% for LQDH. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
HFSP vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 2.31% return.
HFSP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
HFSP vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -5.81% | -24.01% | 1.15% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.31% | 7.00% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSP and LQDH is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSP vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
HFSP
LQDH
HFSP vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFSP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.57 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.26 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 13.85 | -14.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFSP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 2.83 | -3.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.58 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
HFSP vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than LQDH's maximum drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -24.63% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -2.34% | -22.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.12% | -0.09% | -32.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -1.68% | -15.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 0.55% | +13.49% |
Volatility
HFSP vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.50%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSP | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 0.50% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 2.03% | +10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 2.70% | +18.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 4.41% | +20.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 6.44% | +18.04% |
HFSP vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSP vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSP and LQDH have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFSP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to LQDH (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs LQDH's -24.63%.
On 1-year performance, LQDH leads with 7.62% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LQDH has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 7.62% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.
HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFSP and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer