PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSP vs. EHLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSP vs. EHLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than EHLS's 15.59% return.


HFSP

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
-5.81%
6M
-4.27%
1Y
-14.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EHLS

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.51%
YTD
15.59%
6M
16.66%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSP vs. EHLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
-5.81%-24.01%1.15%
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
15.59%6.67%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and EHLS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSP vs. EHLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSP
HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EHLS
EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSP vs. EHLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSPEHLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.70

1.27

-1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.86

1.72

-2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.23

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

2.63

-3.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

7.72

-8.76

HFSP vs. EHLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the EHLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and EHLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSPEHLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

1.27

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.81

-1.56

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. EHLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than EHLS's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and EHLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSPEHLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-18.96%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-9.06%

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.12%

-1.54%

-30.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.02%

-4.43%

-12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

3.08%

+10.96%

Volatility

HFSP vs. EHLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) is 5.01%, while Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that HFSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSPEHLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

5.41%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

14.54%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

18.71%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

19.76%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

19.76%

+4.72%

HFSP vs. EHLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EHLS's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSP vs. EHLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither HFSP nor EHLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
0.00%0.00%1.03%
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
0.00%0.00%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSP and EHLS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHLS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HFSP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs EHLS's -18.96%.

On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 23.69% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, HFSP is cheaper at 1.25% per year. On volatility, HFSP has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 23.69% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFSP is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

HFSP and EHLS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and N/A. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 1.58% for EHLS.

EHLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSP and EHLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer