HFSP vs. IMF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI, while IMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -22.75% vs 18.87% for IMF. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IMF.

Performance

HFSP vs. IMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly lower than IMF's 11.90% return.

HFSP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.83%
• 6M: -13.71%
• YTD: -9.94%
• 1Y: -22.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 7.89%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 1Y: 18.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSP vs. IMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	-9.94%	-20.92%
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	11.90%	-8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and IMF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

HFSP vs. IMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSP

HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 1
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

IMF

IMF Risk / Return Rank: 76
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 75
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSP vs. IMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFSP	IMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	1.79	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	2.34	-4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.35	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	4.18	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	12.67	-14.08

HFSP vs. IMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the IMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and IMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. IMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than IMF's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and IMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFSP	IMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.57%	-15.29%	-20.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.66%	-4.54%	-22.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.10%	-2.71%	-32.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.06%	-8.11%	-9.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.15%	1.49%	+14.66%

Volatility

HFSP vs. IMF - Volatility Comparison

TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) at 2.83%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFSP	IMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	2.83%	+2.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	9.21%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.53%	10.59%	+6.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.15%	12.34%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.15%	12.34%	+11.81%

HFSP vs. IMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IMF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFSP vs. IMF - Dividend Comparison

HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.53%
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.90%	1.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFSP and IMF in my portfolio?

HFSP and IMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFSP or IMF?

HFSP has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to IMF (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -35.57% vs IMF's -15.29%.

Which ETF is better, HFSP or IMF?

On 1-year performance, IMF leads with 18.87% vs -22.75% for HFSP. On fees, IMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HFSP or IMF?

Over the 1-year period, IMF has performed better with a 18.87% return vs -22.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HFSP or IMF?

IMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HFSP or IMF?

IMF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

What is the main difference between HFSP and IMF?

HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while IMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.65% for IMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.