HFSP vs. INFL
HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) and INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI, while INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HFSP returned -14.56% vs 23.41% for INFL. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. HFSP charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INFL.
Performance
HFSP vs. INFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.21% return.
HFSP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFL
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
HFSP vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | -5.81% | -24.01% | 1.15% |
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 17.21% | 18.30% | -4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSP and INFL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSP vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank
HFSP
INFL
HFSP vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFSP | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.81 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 7.68 | -8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFSP | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 1.52 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.91 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
HFSP vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and INFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSP | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -21.30% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.64% | -8.36% | -16.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.12% | -5.51% | -26.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -5.10% | -11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 3.06% | +10.98% |
Volatility
HFSP vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 3.60%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSP | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 3.60% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 12.32% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.93% | 15.52% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 17.71% | +6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 17.64% | +6.84% |
HFSP vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSP vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison
HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.91% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSP and INFL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFSP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to INFL (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs INFL's -21.30%.
On 1-year performance, INFL leads with 23.41% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INFL has performed better with a 23.41% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.
INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.
HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while INFL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.85% for INFL.
INFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFSP and INFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer