PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSP vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSP vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSP achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.21% return.


HFSP

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
-5.81%
6M
-4.27%
1Y
-14.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INFL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.82%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSP vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
-5.81%-24.01%1.15%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.21%18.30%-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSP and INFL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSP vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSP
HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSP vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSPINFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.27

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

2.81

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

7.68

-8.72

HFSP vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSP Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSP and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSPINFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

1.52

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.91

-1.66

Drawdowns

HFSP vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSP drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSP and INFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSPINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-21.30%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-8.36%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.12%

-5.51%

-26.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.02%

-5.10%

-11.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

3.06%

+10.98%

Volatility

HFSP vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 3.60%. This indicates that HFSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSPINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.60%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

12.32%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.93%

15.52%

+5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

17.71%

+6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

17.64%

+6.84%

HFSP vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSP has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSP vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HFSP
TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF
0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSP and INFL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFSP has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to INFL (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSP dropped -33.80% vs INFL's -21.30%.

On 1-year performance, INFL leads with 23.41% vs -14.56% for HFSP. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INFL has performed better with a 23.41% return vs -14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

HFSP is categorized as Long-Short, while INFL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: TradersAI and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for HFSP and 0.85% for INFL.

INFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSP and INFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer