HFSI vs. MANI
HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) and MANI (Man Active Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HFSI charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MANI.
Performance
HFSI vs. MANI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFSI achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than MANI's 5.12% return.
HFSI
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.61%
MANI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.57M | $12.84M | $8.48M | |
| $13.20K | $27.24K | $70.35K |
HFSI vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.08% | 1.14% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 5.12% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFSI and MANI is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFSI vs. MANI — Risk / Return Rank
HFSI
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HFSI vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFSI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFSI vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and MANI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFSI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -0.74% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -0.10% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
HFSI vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFSI | MANI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 1.96% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 1.96% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 1.96% | +2.96% |
HFSI vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFSI vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison
HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than MANI's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.61% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.64% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFSI and MANI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HFSI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HFSI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 4.64% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HFSI and 0.85% for MANI.
Find the right allocation for HFSI and MANI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer