PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSI vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HFSI vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HFSI vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
-0.99%9.56%7.91%5.66%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
-0.92%9.57%7.69%5.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSI achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than PYLD's -0.92% return.


HFSI

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
0.35%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HFSI vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HFSI vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSI vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFSIPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.72

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

2.39

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.84

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.04

7.60

-0.56

HFSI vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSI and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFSIPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.72

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.99

-1.53

Correlation

The correlation between HFSI and PYLD is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HFSI vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than PYLD's 6.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.66%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.36%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HFSI vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSI drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSI and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSIPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-4.52%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-3.25%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-2.28%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-0.64%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.79%

+0.11%

Volatility

HFSI vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) have volatilities of 1.61% and 1.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HFSIPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.61%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.12%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27%

3.43%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

4.00%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

4.00%

+1.02%