HFGO vs. ROAM
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while ROAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. HFGO is actively managed, while ROAM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 23.35%/yr vs 21.21%/yr for ROAM. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
HFGO vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 18.83% return.
HFGO
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 14.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.01%
ROAM
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 35.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $551.12K | $771.71K | $1.12M | |
| $526.87K | $482.26K | $1.06M |
HFGO vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 5.49% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -6.95% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 18.83% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 21.28% | -14.78% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and ROAM is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between HFGO and ROAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HFGO vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFGO
ROAM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HFGO
ROAM
Communication Services
HFGO
ROAM
Consumer Cyclical
HFGO
ROAM
Healthcare
HFGO
ROAM
Industrials
HFGO
ROAM
Financial Services
HFGO
ROAM
Basic Materials
HFGO
ROAM
Consumer Defensive
HFGO
ROAM
Energy
HFGO
ROAM
Real Estate
HFGO
-
ROAM
Utilities
HFGO
-
ROAM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
ROAM
HFGO vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 3.16 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 9.65 | -7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -45.47% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -11.14% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -16.79% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -8.00% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -11.05% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 3.64% | +2.71% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.03%. This indicates that HFGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 6.03% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 15.74% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 17.57% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 15.73% | +10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 17.95% | +8.01% |
HFGO vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.46% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFGO and ROAM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFGO has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to ROAM (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs ROAM's -45.47%.
On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 23.35% vs 21.21% for ROAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 23.35% return vs 21.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ROAM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer