HFGO vs. ROAM
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while ROAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. HFGO is actively managed, while ROAM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 26.77%/yr vs 26.00%/yr for ROAM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
HFGO vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 26.83% return.
HFGO
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- 1Y
- 51.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
HFGO vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.58% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -5.15% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 26.83% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 21.28% | -14.78% | 0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and ROAM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between HFGO and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFGO vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFGO
ROAM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HFGO
ROAM
Communication Services
HFGO
ROAM
Consumer Cyclical
HFGO
ROAM
Healthcare
HFGO
ROAM
Industrials
HFGO
ROAM
Financial Services
HFGO
ROAM
Energy
HFGO
ROAM
Consumer Defensive
HFGO
ROAM
Basic Materials
HFGO
-
ROAM
Real Estate
HFGO
-
ROAM
Utilities
HFGO
-
ROAM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
ROAM
HFGO vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 5.27 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 19.91 | -14.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 3.50 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.38 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -45.47% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -9.92% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -16.79% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.60% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -11.13% | -4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 2.62% | +3.05% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is 4.77%, while Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that HFGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 6.41% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 12.76% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 14.93% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 15.23% | +10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 17.87% | +8.04% |
HFGO vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFGO and ROAM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAM has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to HFGO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs ROAM's -45.47%.
On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 26.77% vs 26.00% for ROAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, HFGO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 26.77% return vs 26.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ROAM is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer