PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFAAX vs. JANRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAAX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than JANRX's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HFAAX has underperformed JANRX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while JANRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.


HFAAX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
2.13%

JANRX

1D
-0.94%
1M
2.48%
YTD
8.94%
6M
9.69%
1Y
20.43%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
0.22%5.75%1.52%6.35%-16.76%-0.78%9.16%9.50%0.38%5.75%
JANRX
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund
8.94%19.49%17.21%17.41%-9.94%15.96%16.14%27.43%-9.80%31.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAAX and JANRX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2003

0.15

Over the past year, HFAAX and JANRX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFAAX vs. JANRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFAAX
HFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JANRX
JANRX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JANRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JANRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFAAXJANRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.20

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

9.79

-1.92

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the JANRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAAX and JANRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFAAXJANRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.84

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.65

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.74

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Drawdowns

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAAX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, smaller than the maximum JANRX drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAAX and JANRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFAAXJANRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.89%

-63.94%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-9.67%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-19.56%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-23.48%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

-39.17%

+17.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-0.94%

-5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-17.79%

+12.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.17%

-1.62%

Volatility

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) is 0.83%, while Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that HFAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JANRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFAAXJANRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

3.90%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

9.55%

-7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

11.59%

-9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

16.18%

-10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

17.98%

-13.24%

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than JANRX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFAAX vs. JANRX - Dividend Comparison

HFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than JANRX's 9.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
3.72%3.51%2.90%2.32%8.76%1.33%4.31%3.44%4.86%2.69%2.44%3.34%
JANRX
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund
9.83%10.71%10.44%8.62%2.81%13.04%5.11%4.37%17.07%0.86%1.14%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFAAX and JANRX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JANRX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to HFAAX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAAX dropped -44.89% vs JANRX's -63.94%.

HFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFAAX and JANRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer