HFAAX vs. RFRAX
HFAAX (Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund) and RFRAX (Columbia Floating Rate Fund) are both mutual funds - HFAAX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Janus Henderson, while RFRAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, HFAAX returned 1.82%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for RFRAX. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HFAAX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for RFRAX.
Performance
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFAAX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than RFRAX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HFAAX has underperformed RFRAX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while RFRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.20% annualized return.
HFAAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
RFRAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFAAX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund | 0.10% | 5.75% | 1.52% | 6.35% | -16.76% | -0.78% | 9.16% | 9.50% | 0.38% | 5.75% |
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 1.52% | 5.83% | 6.55% | 11.01% | -2.90% | 4.53% | 1.03% | 7.60% | 0.08% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFAAX and RFRAX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007 | 0.26 |
The correlation between HFAAX and RFRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFAAX vs. RFRAX — Risk / Return Rank
HFAAX
RFRAX
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HFAAX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.10 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 7.16 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFAAX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than RFRAX's maximum drawdown of -33.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAAX and RFRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFAAX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.89% | -33.04% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -1.72% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.27% | -2.57% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | -6.90% | -14.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.62% | -21.74% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -0.15% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -2.24% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.50% | +0.13% |
Volatility
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) at 0.17%. This indicates that HFAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFAAX | RFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 0.17% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 1.61% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35% | 2.19% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 2.65% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 3.81% | +0.91% |
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than RFRAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFAAX vs. RFRAX - Dividend Comparison
HFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than RFRAX's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFAAX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund | 3.74% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.32% | 8.76% | 1.33% | 4.31% | 3.44% | 4.86% | 2.69% | 2.44% | 3.34% |
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 5.93% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.60% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.44% | 4.82% | 4.41% | 3.52% | 3.85% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HFAAX and RFRAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFAAX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to RFRAX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAAX dropped -44.89% vs RFRAX's -33.04%.
RFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFAAX and RFRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer