PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFAAX vs. FBIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAAX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than FBIIX's 1.16% return.


HFAAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
2.22%

FBIIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.27%
1Y
2.22%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
0.74%5.75%1.52%6.35%-16.76%-0.78%9.16%-1.06%
FBIIX
Fidelity International Bond Index Fund
1.16%2.66%4.64%7.48%-10.84%-1.84%4.43%-1.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAAX and FBIIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.76

The correlation between HFAAX and FBIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFAAX vs. FBIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFAAX
HFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FBIIX
FBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFAAXFBIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.14

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.80

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

2.18

+6.14

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the FBIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAAX and FBIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAAX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than FBIIX's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAAX and FBIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFAAXFBIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.89%

-13.79%

-31.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-2.78%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-2.78%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-13.74%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-0.79%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.10%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

1.02%

-0.47%

Volatility

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Fidelity International Bond Index Fund (FBIIX) have volatilities of 0.81% and 0.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFAAXFBIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.85%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

2.67%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

3.04%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

3.59%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

3.42%

+1.32%

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FBIIX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFAAX vs. FBIIX - Dividend Comparison

HFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than FBIIX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBIIX
Fidelity International Bond Index Fund
4.16%4.09%3.44%2.85%1.02%0.62%0.74%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
3.70%3.51%2.90%2.32%8.76%1.33%4.31%3.44%4.86%2.69%2.44%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFAAX and FBIIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBIIX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to HFAAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAAX dropped -44.89% vs FBIIX's -13.79%.

HFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFAAX and FBIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer