PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFAAX vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAAX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HFAAX has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 2.15%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.27% annualized return.


HFAAX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.56%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
-0.71%
10Y*
2.15%

ANGL

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
0.48%5.75%1.52%6.35%-16.76%-0.78%9.16%9.50%0.38%5.75%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.55%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAAX and ANGL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012

0.32

Over the past year, HFAAX and ANGL have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFAAX vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFAAX
HFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFAAXANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.02

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

8.49

+0.13

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAAX and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFAAXANGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.90

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.45

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.68

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.74

-0.06

Drawdowns

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAAX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAAX and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFAAXANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.89%

-29.31%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-4.05%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-5.48%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-19.25%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

-29.31%

+7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-0.30%

-5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.30%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.96%

-0.41%

Volatility

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) is 0.80%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that HFAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFAAXANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

1.37%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

3.46%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23%

4.31%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

7.63%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

9.28%

-4.54%

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFAAX vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

HFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than ANGL's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.37%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
3.71%3.51%2.90%2.32%8.76%1.33%4.31%3.44%4.86%2.69%2.44%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFAAX and ANGL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to HFAAX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAAX dropped -44.89% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

HFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFAAX and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer