HEZU vs. FLSW
HEZU (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - HEZU tracks the MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index while FLSW tracks the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEZU returned 12.27%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for FLSW. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEZU charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLSW.
Performance
HEZU vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEZU achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 2.27% return.
HEZU
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 18.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
FLSW
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 13.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- —
HEZU vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.75% | 25.93% | 10.63% | 22.98% | -9.54% | 23.51% | 0.52% | 29.48% | -7.41% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.27% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEZU and FLSW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between HEZU and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEZU vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEZU
FLSW
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEZU
FLSW
Industrials
HEZU
FLSW
Technology
HEZU
FLSW
Consumer Cyclical
HEZU
FLSW
Utilities
HEZU
FLSW
Healthcare
HEZU
FLSW
Consumer Defensive
HEZU
FLSW
Energy
HEZU
FLSW
-
Basic Materials
HEZU
FLSW
Communication Services
HEZU
FLSW
Real Estate
HEZU
FLSW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEZU vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank
HEZU
FLSW
HEZU vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEZU | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.98 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 3.17 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEZU | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.84 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.44 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HEZU vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and FLSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEZU | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -28.16% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -13.38% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.83% | -13.38% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.79% | -28.16% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -5.87% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -5.96% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.14% | -1.31% |
Volatility
HEZU vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 4.60%. This indicates that HEZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEZU | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.60% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.27% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 15.60% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 15.72% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 16.89% | +1.54% |
HEZU vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEZU vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than FLSW's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.07% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEZU iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.69% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 23.26% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 5.40% | 3.48% | 1.92% | 3.11% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEZU and FLSW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEZU has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to FLSW (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs FLSW's -28.16%.
On 5-year performance, HEZU leads with 12.27% vs 6.91% for FLSW. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HEZU.
HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.07% for FLSW.
HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.09% for FLSW.
HEZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEZU and FLSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer