FLJH vs. FLSW
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW).
FLJH and FLSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. FLSW is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. Both FLJH and FLSW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLJH vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLJH vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 6.40% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -13.66% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | -2.21% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's -2.21% return.
FLJH
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 35.61%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSW
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLJH vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLJH and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLJH vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank
FLJH
FLSW
FLJH vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLJH | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 0.99 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.46 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 1.08 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 4.21 | +6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLJH | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.99 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.52 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.54 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and FLSW is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLJH vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FLSW's 2.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.67% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.17% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and FLSW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLJH | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -28.16% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -13.38% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -28.16% | +7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -10.00% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -5.97% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.43% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FLJH vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 6.41%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLJH | FLSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 6.41% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 10.64% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 16.53% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 15.50% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 16.84% | +3.04% |