FLJH vs. FLSW
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW).
FLJH and FLSW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. FLSW is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. Both FLJH and FLSW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLJH or FLSW.
Key characteristics
| FLJH | FLSW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.76% | 5.24% |
| 1Y Return | 28.51% | 18.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.42% | 1.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.30% | 7.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.39 | 1.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.80 | 2.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.80 | 6.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.60% | 2.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.31% | 12.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.36% | -28.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.23% | -6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and FLSW is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLJH vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 5.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLJH vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLJH and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLJH vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLJH vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.38%, more than FLSW's 2.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 22.38% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.05% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.00% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.85% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and FLSW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLJH vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 3.70%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.