HERO vs. AIQ
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while AIQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -1.39%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for AIQ. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
HERO vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -10.56% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 19.09% return.
HERO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
AIQ
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 19.09%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $119.65M | $125.66M | $166.59M | |
| $881.17K | $612.17K | $690.19K |
HERO vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -10.56% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 19.09% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and AIQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HERO and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
AIQ
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
AIQ
Technology
HERO
AIQ
Industrials
HERO
AIQ
Basic Materials
HERO
-
AIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
AIQ
-
Energy
HERO
-
AIQ
-
Financial Services
HERO
-
AIQ
Healthcare
HERO
-
AIQ
Real Estate
HERO
-
AIQ
-
Utilities
HERO
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
AIQ
HERO vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.24 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 1.96 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 5.85 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -44.66% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -20.19% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -26.35% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -44.66% | -1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.74% | -13.64% | -11.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -9.82% | -16.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 6.76% | +10.88% |
Volatility
HERO vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 7.39%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 10.54% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 24.90% | -8.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 28.63% | -8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.48% | 26.45% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 25.99% | -1.54% |
HERO vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than AIQ's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.08% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.74% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and AIQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to HERO (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 14.71% vs -1.39% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 14.71% return vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.08% for AIQ.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AIQ is Artificial Intelligence. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer