PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERD vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERD vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 29.53% return.


HERD

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.94%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.97%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%

HGER

1D
0.00%
1M
8.95%
6M
20.19%
YTD
29.53%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$194.03K$197.87K$182.95K
$46.51M$66.72M$45.77M

HERD vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
14.97%19.07%2.91%20.72%-8.42%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
29.53%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HERD and HGER is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between HERD and HGER has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERD vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERD vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HERDHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.87

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

10.23

+5.32

HERD vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERD and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERD vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERDHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-23.31%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-14.04%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-14.04%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-3.94%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-7.66%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.94%

-2.11%

Volatility

HERD vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) is 3.60%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that HERD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERDHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.64%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

15.43%

-6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

17.71%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

17.67%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

17.67%

+2.69%

HERD vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERD vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than HGER's 5.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.73%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.47%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERD and HGER have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGER has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to HERD (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs HGER's -23.31%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 18.61% vs 14.59% for HERD. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 14.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 2.73% for HERD.

HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while HGER is Commodities. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.68% for HGER.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERD and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer