HERD vs. DRIV
HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index while DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERD returned 9.95%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DRIV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
HERD vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HERD vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERD and DRIV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HERD and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
HERD vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERD
DRIV
Technology
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
HERD
DRIV
Energy
HERD
DRIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
HERD
DRIV
Healthcare
HERD
DRIV
-
Industrials
HERD
DRIV
Communication Services
HERD
DRIV
Consumer Defensive
HERD
DRIV
-
Basic Materials
HERD
DRIV
Utilities
HERD
DRIV
-
Real Estate
HERD
DRIV
-
Financial Services
HERD
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERD vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
HERD
DRIV
HERD vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HERD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.55 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 6.92 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.73 | 24.10 | -6.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HERD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 3.70 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.35 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.54 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
HERD vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.41% | -41.93% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.68% | -13.43% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -34.18% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.60% | -41.93% | +20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.04% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -15.13% | +10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 3.85% | -2.19% |
Volatility
HERD vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) is 2.92%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that HERD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 9.36% | -6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 19.29% | -11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 25.14% | -13.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 27.07% | -9.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 27.40% | -6.90% |
HERD vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERD vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERD and DRIV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 9.95% vs 9.49% for DRIV. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERD and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer