PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERD vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERD vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 2.78% return.


HERD

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.94%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.97%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%

BALT

1D
0.17%
1M
0.48%
6M
2.21%
YTD
2.78%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.85M$18.00M$16.07M
$194.03K$197.87K$182.95K

HERD vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
14.97%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%5.03%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
2.78%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HERD and BALT is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.58

The correlation between HERD and BALT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

HERD vs. BALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERD
BALT

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
9.6%

Healthcare

16.9%
9.1%

Technology

16.3%
37.9%

Industrials

11.9%
8.4%

Energy

10.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

8.8%
10.0%

Basic Materials

6.2%
1.7%

Utilities

1.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HERD
17.8%
BALT
9.6%

Healthcare

HERD
16.9%
BALT
9.1%

Technology

HERD
16.3%
BALT
37.9%

Industrials

HERD
11.9%
BALT
8.4%

Energy

HERD
10.4%
BALT
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

HERD
10.1%
BALT
4.6%

Communication Services

HERD
8.8%
BALT
10.0%

Basic Materials

HERD
6.2%
BALT
1.7%

Utilities

HERD
1.3%
BALT
2.3%

Real Estate

HERD
0.4%
BALT
1.9%

Financial Services

HERD
0.0%
BALT
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERD vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERD vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HERDBALTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.62

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

5.71

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

21.02

-5.47

HERD vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERD and BALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERD vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and BALT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERDBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-4.89%

-34.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-1.15%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-4.89%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-4.89%

-16.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-0.34%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.31%

+1.52%

Volatility

HERD vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.80%. This indicates that HERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERDBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

0.80%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

1.49%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

2.27%

+9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

3.30%

+14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

3.28%

+17.08%

HERD vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERD vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.73%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERD and BALT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to BALT (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs BALT's -4.89%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.62% vs 5.98% for BALT. On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.00% for BALT.

HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while BALT is Defined Outcome. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while BALT tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.69% for BALT.

BALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERD and BALT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer