PortfoliosLab logo
BALT vs. BSCT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BALT and BSCT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

BALT vs. BSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
21.73%
-0.47%
BALT
BSCT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BALT:

1.60

BSCT:

2.01

Sortino Ratio

BALT:

2.39

BSCT:

2.97

Omega Ratio

BALT:

1.41

BSCT:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

BALT:

1.64

BSCT:

0.85

Martin Ratio

BALT:

8.51

BSCT:

7.80

Ulcer Index

BALT:

0.94%

BSCT:

1.02%

Daily Std Dev

BALT:

5.00%

BSCT:

3.98%

Max Drawdown

BALT:

-4.89%

BSCT:

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

BALT:

-1.82%

BSCT:

-2.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALT achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than BSCT's 2.28% return.


BALT

YTD

-0.35%

1M

-0.22%

6M

1.11%

1Y

7.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BSCT

YTD

2.28%

1M

0.39%

6M

2.17%

1Y

8.02%

5Y*

1.36%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BALT vs. BSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BALT: current value is 0.69%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BALT: 0.69%
Expense ratio chart for BSCT: current value is 0.10%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BSCT: 0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BALT vs. BSCT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BALT is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BALT is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BALT is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BALT is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BALT is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BALT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSCT is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSCT is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSCT is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSCT is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSCT is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSCT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BALT vs. BSCT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BALT, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BALT: 1.60
BSCT: 2.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for BALT, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BALT: 2.39
BSCT: 2.97
The chart of Omega ratio for BALT, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BALT: 1.41
BSCT: 1.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for BALT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BALT: 1.64
BSCT: 0.85
The chart of Martin ratio for BALT, currently valued at 8.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BALT: 8.51
BSCT: 7.80

The current BALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the BSCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALT and BSCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.60
2.01
BALT
BSCT

Dividends

BALT vs. BSCT - Dividend Comparison

BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.


TTM202420232022202120202019
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%

Drawdowns

BALT vs. BSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALT drawdown since its inception was -4.89%, smaller than the maximum BSCT drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALT and BSCT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.82%
-2.06%
BALT
BSCT

Volatility

BALT vs. BSCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) at 2.09%. This indicates that BALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
3.95%
2.09%
BALT
BSCT