PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALT vs. BSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BALT vs. BSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BALT vs. BSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.13%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.16%7.51%3.45%8.61%-12.88%-0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALT achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than BSCT's 0.16% return.


BALT

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.97%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*

BSCT

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
0.16%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BALT vs. BSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BALT vs. BSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCT
BSCT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALT vs. BSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALTBSCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.74

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.29

2.44

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.80

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.79

11.75

+1.04

BALT vs. BSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BSCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALT and BSCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALTBSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.32

+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between BALT and BSCT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BALT vs. BSCT - Dividend Comparison

BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.53%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%

Drawdowns

BALT vs. BSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALT drawdown since its inception was -4.89%, smaller than the maximum BSCT drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALT and BSCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BALTBSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-19.14%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-1.93%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.93%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-5.49%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.46%

+0.06%

Volatility

BALT vs. BSCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) is 0.61%, while Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that BALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BALTBSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

1.08%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

1.60%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

3.11%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.36%

5.74%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

7.35%

-3.99%