PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQ vs. TIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQ achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HEQ has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 7.64%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


HEQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.69%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.49%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
7.64%

TIBIX

1D
0.65%
1M
3.13%
YTD
17.96%
6M
21.37%
1Y
39.83%
3Y*
26.83%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
12.47%15.64%11.70%-3.14%-3.08%24.44%-14.28%26.76%-17.29%23.20%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
17.96%37.01%13.48%18.28%-7.69%20.36%-0.40%18.01%-4.31%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQ and TIBIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2011

0.53

The correlation between HEQ and TIBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQ vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQ
HEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBIX
TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEQTIBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

4.77

-2.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

6.85

-3.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.96

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

7.48

-4.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.88

29.20

-15.32

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQ and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEQTIBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

4.77

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.48

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.95

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Drawdowns

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQ drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQ and TIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQTIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-48.88%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-5.39%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-9.23%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-20.79%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-34.85%

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-5.96%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.38%

+0.27%

Volatility

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.12%. This indicates that HEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQTIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.12%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

6.99%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

8.46%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

11.16%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

13.50%

+5.35%

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQ has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEQ vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

HEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than TIBIX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEQ
John Hancock Diversified Income Fund
8.46%9.30%9.79%10.75%10.09%8.92%11.64%10.09%11.50%10.44%9.57%10.40%
TIBIX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I
5.03%5.83%5.67%4.89%5.89%5.33%4.31%4.46%4.77%4.52%4.14%4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQ and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEQ has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to TIBIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQ dropped -44.38% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQ and TIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer