HELS vs. SENT
HELS (Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HELS is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. HELS charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.
Performance
HELS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HELS
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -2.32%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SENT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- -3.46%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
HELS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | -2.32% | -2.83% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HELS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.25 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
HELS vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and SENT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -30.34% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | 0.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.47% | -27.23% | +18.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -20.91% | +15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
HELS vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELS | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 0.00% | +16.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 12.65% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 13.31% | +3.35% |
HELS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison
HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HELS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HELS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.
HELS has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HELS and 1.01% for SENT.
Find the right allocation for HELS and SENT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer