PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HELS vs. SENT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HELS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HELS

1D
-3.38%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SENT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-3.46%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HELS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HELS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HELS vs. SENT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HELSSENTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-0.25

-0.38

Drawdowns

HELS vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and SENT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HELSSENTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-30.34%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-27.23%

+18.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-20.91%

+15.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

HELS vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HELSSENTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

0.00%

+16.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

12.65%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

13.31%

+3.35%

HELS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HELS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HELS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HELS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HELS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

HELS has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HELS and 1.01% for SENT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HELS and SENT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer