HELS vs. ATTR
HELS (Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HELS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
HELS vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than ATTR's 3.14% return.
HELS
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELS vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 1.10% | -2.37% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 3.14% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELS and ATTR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELS vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HELS vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -1.76% | -11.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -1.25% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -0.23% | -5.47% |
Volatility
HELS vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 3.16% | +13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 3.16% | +13.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 3.16% | +13.54% |
HELS vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELS vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HELS and ATTR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HELS.
HELS has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HELS and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for HELS and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer