HELS vs. HGRO
HELS (Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF) and HGRO (Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HELS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while HGRO is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Hedgeye. Both are actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.
Performance
HELS vs. HGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELS achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than HGRO's 8.58% return.
HELS
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HGRO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $184.77K | $173.29K | $282.83K | |
| $1.35M | $1.37M | $1.84M |
HELS vs. HGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | -1.75% | -2.37% |
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF | 8.58% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELS and HGRO is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELS vs. HGRO — Risk / Return Rank
HELS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HGRO
HELS vs. HGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HELS | HGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HELS vs. HGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than HGRO's maximum drawdown of -7.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and HGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELS | HGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -7.61% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -3.02% | -4.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -1.66% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility
HELS vs. HGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELS | HGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 14.03% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 13.72% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 13.72% | +1.75% |
HELS vs. HGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HELS and HGRO have an expense ratio of 0.70%.
Dividends
HELS vs. HGRO - Dividend Comparison
HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than HGRO's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
HGRO Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HELS and HGRO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HELS and HGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.
HGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.02% for HELS.
HELS is categorized as Long-Short, while HGRO is Quality Factor.
Find the right allocation for HELS and HGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer