HEGD vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEGD (Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEGD is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the S&P 500, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. HEGD is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, HEGD returned 17.89% vs 26.98% for QFLR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEGD charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

HEGD vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HEGD having a 6.84% return and QFLR slightly higher at 6.90%.

HEGD

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 17.89%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 5.88%
• 1Y: 26.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEGD vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	6.84%	12.95%	13.95%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.90%	17.27%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HEGD and QFLR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.80

The correlation between HEGD and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEGD vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEGD	QFLR
Technology	36.1%	50.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	0.9%
Communication Services	11.0%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	3.2%
Industrials	8.2%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	9.2%
Energy	3.5%	1.1%
Utilities	2.3%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.0%

Return for Risk

HEGD vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEGD

HEGD Risk / Return Rank: 79
HEGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HEGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HEGD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HEGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HEGD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEGD vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEGD	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.41	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.26	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	3.56	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.25	15.19	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEGD vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEGD and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEGD	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.41	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	1.40	-0.34

Drawdowns

HEGD vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEGD drawdown since its inception was -14.56%, roughly equal to the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEGD and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEGD	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.56%	-13.97%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.39%	-7.61%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.48%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-2.50%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.78%	-0.68%

Volatility

HEGD vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) is 2.34%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that HEGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEGD	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	2.53%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	8.05%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.96%	11.28%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.40%	12.62%	-3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.35%	12.62%	-3.27%

HEGD vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEGD has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEGD vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

HEGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEGD Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF	0.34%	0.36%	0.43%	0.39%	0.87%	0.31%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEGD and QFLR in my portfolio?

HEGD and QFLR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEGD or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to HEGD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEGD dropped -14.56% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, HEGD or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 26.98% vs 17.89% for HEGD. On fees, HEGD is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, HEGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEGD or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 26.98% return vs 17.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEGD or QFLR?

HEGD is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEGD or QFLR?

HEGD has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between HEGD and QFLR?

HEGD is categorized as Equity Hedged, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Swan and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for HEGD and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.