PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 10.40%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


HEEM

1D
-5.76%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
20.85%
6M
21.68%
1Y
50.37%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.40%

DGRO

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.16%
YTD
8.79%
6M
9.12%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.85%34.02%12.59%10.14%-16.85%-1.82%17.94%18.53%-11.09%27.59%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and DGRO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2014

0.59

The correlation between HEEM and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEEM vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEEM
DGRO

Technology

37.0%
19.4%

Financial Services

19.4%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.7%

Industrials

7.5%
10.8%

Communication Services

6.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.5%
2.5%

Energy

4.0%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
11.5%

Healthcare

2.9%
16.4%

Utilities

2.1%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

HEEM
37.0%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

HEEM
19.4%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HEEM
9.6%
DGRO
5.7%

Industrials

HEEM
7.5%
DGRO
10.8%

Communication Services

HEEM
6.9%
DGRO
0.1%

Basic Materials

HEEM
6.5%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

HEEM
4.0%
DGRO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

HEEM
3.0%
DGRO
11.5%

Healthcare

HEEM
2.9%
DGRO
16.4%

Utilities

HEEM
2.1%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

HEEM
1.1%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEEMDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

3.60

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.40

13.91

+4.49

HEEM vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEEMDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.45

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.77

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.76

-0.31

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-35.10%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-6.47%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-14.03%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-19.31%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-35.10%

+1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-0.78%

-7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-3.44%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.67%

+1.08%

Volatility

HEEM vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.42%. This indicates that HEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

2.42%

+7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

6.94%

+9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

9.52%

+9.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

13.82%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

16.62%

+1.44%

HEEM vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.29%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEEM and DGRO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEEM has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to DGRO (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.23% vs 10.40% for HEEM. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

HEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.08% for DGRO.

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer