PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 9.86%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.


HEEM

1D
0.85%
1M
-4.02%
6M
9.21%
YTD
18.23%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
7.84%

EDIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.49%
6M
2.77%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
8.24%
ALL TIME*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.15M$4.91M$5.47M
$10.32M$12.63M$6.04M

HEEM vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.23%34.02%12.59%10.14%-16.85%-1.82%17.94%18.53%-11.09%27.59%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.94%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and EDIV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.78

The correlation between HEEM and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEEM vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEEM
EDIV

Technology

45.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

18.5%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.8%

Industrials

6.3%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.1%

Basic Materials

5.5%
0.8%

Energy

3.2%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
9.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
0.6%

Utilities

1.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

HEEM
45.2%
EDIV
6.4%

Financial Services

HEEM
18.5%
EDIV
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HEEM
7.5%
EDIV
7.8%

Industrials

HEEM
6.3%
EDIV
6.2%

Communication Services

HEEM
6.0%
EDIV
5.1%

Basic Materials

HEEM
5.5%
EDIV
0.8%

Energy

HEEM
3.2%
EDIV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

HEEM
2.6%
EDIV
9.3%

Healthcare

HEEM
2.5%
EDIV
0.6%

Utilities

HEEM
1.8%
EDIV
1.8%

Real Estate

HEEM
1.0%
EDIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEEM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEEMEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.35

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

3.93

+5.55

HEEM vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-53.36%

+19.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.01%

-10.36%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-13.84%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-28.32%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-40.76%

+7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.28%

-2.70%

-8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-19.19%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.54%

+0.56%

Volatility

HEEM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.22%. This indicates that HEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

4.22%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.67%

11.16%

+9.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.65%

12.94%

+9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

13.95%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

17.31%

+1.09%

HEEM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than EDIV's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.21%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.25%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEEM and EDIV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEEM has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to EDIV (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, HEEM leads with 9.86% vs 8.24% for EDIV. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.25% for HEEM.

HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.49% for EDIV.

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer