PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. HEWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 10.05%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.55% annualized return.


HEEM

1D
-3.79%
1M
-4.46%
6M
13.12%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
43.38%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
10.05%

HEWJ

1D
-1.53%
1M
1.92%
6M
14.03%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
21.60%
10Y*
16.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
20.28%34.02%12.59%10.14%-16.85%-1.82%17.94%18.53%-11.09%27.59%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
21.52%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and HEWJ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.59

The correlation between HEEM and HEWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEEM
HEWJ

Technology

44.3%
26.7%

Financial Services

17.7%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.8%

Industrials

6.6%
23.0%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.8%

Energy

3.4%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.4%

Healthcare

2.5%
5.7%

Utilities

1.8%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

HEEM
44.3%
HEWJ
26.7%

Financial Services

HEEM
17.7%
HEWJ
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HEEM
8.3%
HEWJ
10.8%

Industrials

HEEM
6.6%
HEWJ
23.0%

Communication Services

HEEM
6.0%
HEWJ
5.0%

Basic Materials

HEEM
5.9%
HEWJ
3.8%

Energy

HEEM
3.4%
HEWJ
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

HEEM
2.5%
HEWJ
3.4%

Healthcare

HEEM
2.5%
HEWJ
5.7%

Utilities

HEEM
1.8%
HEWJ
0.9%

Real Estate

HEEM
1.0%
HEWJ
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEEMHEWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

5.06

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

18.82

-5.32

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the HEWJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and HEWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, which is greater than HEWJ's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and HEWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMHEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-31.53%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-10.37%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-20.90%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-20.90%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-31.53%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-3.95%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-6.58%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.78%

+0.44%

Volatility

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) at 8.04%. This indicates that HEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMHEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

8.04%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

15.95%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

20.17%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

19.34%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

19.46%

-1.17%

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than HEWJ's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.19%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.09%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEEM and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEEM has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to HEWJ (8.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 16.55% vs 10.05% for HEEM. On fees, HEWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 16.55% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 3.19% for HEEM.

HEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and HEWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer