HDV vs. XLV
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.47%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for XLV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
HDV vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDV having a 9.47% annualized return and XLV not far ahead at 9.81%.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
HDV vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 15.30% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and XLV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HDV and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
XLV
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
XLV
-
Energy
HDV
XLV
-
Healthcare
HDV
XLV
Financial Services
HDV
XLV
-
Technology
HDV
XLV
-
Utilities
HDV
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
XLV
-
Industrials
HDV
XLV
-
Basic Materials
HDV
XLV
-
Communication Services
HDV
XLV
-
Real Estate
HDV
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
XLV
HDV vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 1.38 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 3.31 | +8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -39.17% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.47% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -17.11% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -17.11% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -28.40% | -8.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -3.59% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -7.12% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 4.37% | -2.50% |
Volatility
HDV vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.10%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 4.90% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 10.60% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 15.03% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 14.75% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.58% | -0.85% |
HDV vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HDV and XLV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than XLV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.84% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and XLV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to HDV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.81% vs 9.47% for HDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV and XLV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.63% for XLV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer