HDV vs. SLV
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.26%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
HDV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.26%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
HDV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011 | 0.15 |
HDV vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
SLV
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
SLV
-
Energy
HDV
SLV
-
Healthcare
HDV
SLV
-
Financial Services
HDV
SLV
-
Utilities
HDV
SLV
-
Technology
HDV
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
SLV
-
Industrials
HDV
SLV
-
Basic Materials
HDV
SLV
Communication Services
HDV
SLV
-
Real Estate
HDV
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
SLV
HDV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 2.62 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 5.64 | +5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.89 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.58 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.25 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -76.28% | +39.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -42.45% | +37.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -42.45% | +31.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -42.45% | +27.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -42.81% | +5.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -37.30% | +34.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -44.67% | +41.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 19.67% | -17.82% |
Volatility
HDV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.19%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 16.30% | -13.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 58.31% | -50.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 58.90% | -49.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 36.15% | -23.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 31.84% | -16.11% |
HDV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to HDV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 9.26% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while SLV is Silver. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.50% for SLV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer