HDV vs. PDT
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.26%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for PDT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for PDT.
Performance
HDV vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 9.26%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.12% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
PDT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
HDV vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 3.84% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and PDT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011 | 0.42 |
The correlation between HDV and PDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
PDT
HDV vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.09 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 0.83 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 1.92 | +9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.50 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.15 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.24 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.31 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and PDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -62.39% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -5.38% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -22.06% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -40.44% | +25.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -62.39% | +25.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -4.11% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -10.02% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.33% | -0.48% |
Volatility
HDV vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.08% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 6.93% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 8.93% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 17.03% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 25.16% | -9.43% |
HDV vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than PDT's 7.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.75% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and PDT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PDT (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs PDT's -62.39%.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and PDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer