PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 9.26%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.68% annualized return.


HDV

1D
0.37%
1M
0.29%
YTD
12.69%
6M
12.16%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
9.26%

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.69%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and ILCV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and ILCV has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
ILCV

Consumer Defensive

24.1%
7.6%

Energy

22.3%
6.0%

Healthcare

16.5%
11.5%

Financial Services

11.1%
16.5%

Utilities

9.2%
3.5%

Technology

8.2%
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
9.5%

Industrials

1.4%
8.8%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

0.1%
8.0%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.1%
ILCV
7.6%

Energy

HDV
22.3%
ILCV
6.0%

Healthcare

HDV
16.5%
ILCV
11.5%

Financial Services

HDV
11.1%
ILCV
16.5%

Utilities

HDV
9.2%
ILCV
3.5%

Technology

HDV
8.2%
ILCV
23.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
6.1%
ILCV
9.5%

Industrials

HDV
1.4%
ILCV
8.8%

Basic Materials

HDV
1.2%
ILCV
2.4%

Communication Services

HDV
0.1%
ILCV
8.0%

Real Estate

HDV

-

ILCV
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDVILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.08

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

16.87

-5.85

HDV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDVILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.72

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.46

+0.26

Drawdowns

HDV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-58.63%

+21.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-6.55%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-14.95%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-18.58%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-35.53%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-0.60%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-9.32%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.58%

+0.27%

Volatility

HDV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.01%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

6.97%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

9.82%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

14.21%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

16.66%

-0.93%

HDV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.91%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.68% vs 9.26% for HDV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HDV.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.

HDV is categorized as Dividend, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer